NEW ‘Covered Up Proof’ Xi Jinping personally ordered Uighur genocide
Late. Marco Rubio (R-FL) challenged New York Times – a newspaper with a long history of defending communist atrocities – to explain its decision to withhold critical information indicating that Chinese dictator Xi Jinping was personally the architect behind the ongoing genocide of Muslim minorities in the country.
China is currently operating what is believed to be one of the world’s largest concentration camps in the occupied western region of eastern Turkistan, formally referred to as “Xinjiang” by Beijing. Extensive evidence gathered by human rights experts and journalists has proven that the Chinese Communist Party, under Xi’s control, exposes the ethnic Uighur minority in eastern Turkey to a variety of crimes against humanity, including torture, gang rape, forced sterilization, systematic abortion and child murder and slavery.
The US government under both Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden has formally declared China’s actions against the Uighurs and other Muslim groups in eastern Turkey a “genocide”.
Chinese police beat Uighur women protesting the detention of their family members on July 7, 2009 in Urumqi, the capital of China’s Xinjiang region. (Guang Niu / Getty Images)
The outer wall of a complex that includes what is believed to be an Uighur Rehabilitation Camp on the outskirts of Hotan, in China’s northwestern Xinjiang region, on May 31, 2019. As many as one million Uighurs and other ethnic minorities are believed to be held in a network of detention camps in Xinjiang. (GREG BAKER / AFP via Getty Images)
Xi’s regime claims that the concentration camps are “vocational training facilities” that help underprivileged Uighurs develop job skills and prevent them from engaging in jihad. The Chinese Communist Party has defended abortion and sterilization as a victory for feminism that has made Uighur women “more confident and independent.”
As the most powerful person in China, feat at least 12 official titles, there is little evidence to distinguish Xi from the Uighur genocide. The information New York Times detained regarding Xi in its coverage in 2019, however, will serve as hard evidence in any potential case against Xi for having participated in genocide and crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, which specializes in prosecuting world leaders for such atrocities.
The ICC has refused to prosecute Xi and demand more evidence of his involvement in the genocide.
“For unknown reasons New York Times “It appears to have deliberately detained documents that directly linked top officials of the Chinese Communist Party, including General Secretary Xi Jinping, to the ongoing genocide of Uighur Muslims in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,” Rubio said. wrote in a letter to Times publishes AG Sulzberger on Tuesday. “In the now published ‘Top Secret’ transcripts – documents that New York Times has reportedly been in possession since at least 2019 – Xi explicitly agreed to amend local laws on counter-terrorism, rounding and sentencing of Uighurs, the use of forced sterilization and the use of slave labor in Xinjiang. ”
A man walks past a screen showing pictures of Chinese dictator Xi Jinping in Kashgar in China’s northwestern Xinjiang region on June 4, 2019. (GREG BAKER / AFP via Getty Images)
Lots of information missing from New York Times coverage came to light this week as a result of the work of the Uyghur Tribunal, an independent effort to document China’s genocide campaign. Among these evidences are several speeches Xi personally issued, in which he lamented that the people of Eastern Turkey were too Uighur and directly linked the success of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a global infrastructure colonialism project, to the extermination of Uighurs and other Muslims from the region.
One of the world’s leading researchers documenting the Uighur genocide, Adrian Zenz, confirmed that the information revealed by the Uyghur court came from the same source as New York Times reporting from 2019, but that the content of the newspaper’s reporting did not contain much of what was revealed to be in the documents this week.
In his letter to Times publisher, Rubio demanded answers to five questions:
- Who made the decision not to release the full documents that someone risked their lives to get and give to New York Times in a desperate attempt to save people’s lives in Xinjiang?
- Why did New York Times choose to misleadingly characterize Xi’s political goals as just counter-terrorism and blame the atrocities on the Communist Party at the intermediate level when you had documents explaining Xi’s actual genocide goals?
- Did New York Times has any discussions or communication with the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese government about any of the 403 pages it received? If so, did Times make any agreement or concessions to withhold the release of any of the documents, including Xi’s talk about what he wanted to do in Xinjiang?
- Did someone on New York Times reconsider this decision after the Trump and Biden administrations ruled that the atrocities committed in Xinjiang constitute crimes against humanity and genocide?
- Will New York Times undertake to release the remaining approx. 86 pages of document?
“[I]t looks like New York Times covered by evidence that Xi sanctioned the total destruction of a people, ”Rubio wrote. “No apology will erase your paper’s complicity in the ongoing genocide, but you should at least stop the censorship of your journalists and allow all the details to emerge impartially without fear or favor.”
Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) speaks during a hearing in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on September 14, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Drew Angerer / AFP via Getty Images)
The senator also noted Times‘sad story of protecting genocide actors, most prominent Pulitzer-winning untruths published by journalist Walter Duranty, who denies the genocide of Ukrainians under Joseph Stalin known today as Holodomor.
“We may never know why New York Times and its man in Moscow felt the need to cover up Joseph Stalin’s atrocities aimed at silencing and exterminating millions of peasants, but history seems to be repeating itself, ”Rubio wrote.
That New York Times published a reply on Wednesday in which they both refused to withhold the information in question and justified the withholding of the information in question.
“Senator Marco Rubio is simply wrong about the facts,” was the partial response. “That Times has long covered China thoroughly and relentlessly. “
The newspaper nevertheless admitted not having published any of the information Rubio referred to.
“That Times chose not to publish the documents in their entirety due to concerns that forensic analyzes could enable the Chinese authorities to identify the source and endanger the person, ”was the response.
The answer did not answer any of Rubio’s five questions.
Walter Duranty, the Moscow correspondent for the New York Times who denied Stalin’s genocide of the Ukrainians, read a copy of ‘Pravda’ around 1925. (James Abbe / Hulton Archive / Getty Images)
Dead and dying horses near a Belgorod collective farm during the man-made Holodomor famine in Ukraine, the former Soviet Union, 1934. (Daily Express / Hulton Archive / Getty Images)
The body of a victim of the man-made Holodomor famine lying in a hay wagon in Ukraine, the former Soviet Union, 1934. (Daily Express / Hulton Archive / Getty Images)
That New York Times has on ample occasions failed to disclose or merely fabricated information in defense of Communists. The Duranty example is the most prominent – especially given that the Pulitzer Committee refused to revoke its award in light of the fact that Duranty’s reporting was a lie – but far from a departure.
In the 1950s another Times reporter, Herbert Matthews, published false reports claiming that the soon-to-be brutal Cuban dictator Fidel Castro had amassed a significant army, was very popular in the country, and actively fought against the leader Fulgencio Batista. In fact, Castro and a small group of communists had entrenched themselves in the Cuban countryside, while legitimate and non-left-wing rebels fought Batista in the cities, such as members of the Revolutionary Directorate and rebel leader Frank País. Most notoriously, Matthews greatly exaggerated the size of Castro’s clique on the grounds of having seen the same group of 20 soldiers parade in a circle around him, according to Castro himself.
A New York Times article from February 4, 1957 by reporter Herbert Matthews, which adorns the popularity of the future dictator Fidel Castro.
New York Times Downtown Headquarters in New York City December 7, 2009. (Mario Tama / Getty Images)
Recently have New York Times celebrated the 100th anniversary of communism in Russia with a series of monstrous clumps in 2017 that defended the deadly ideology. Headlines published in “Red century“series includes”Why women had better sex during socialism, “”The Cold War and America’s delusion of victory” and “How Mao shaped communism to create a new China. “
That Times has also published a bizarre ode to “Fully Automatic Luxury Communism”, several paid ads from the communist-oriented socialist dictatorship in Venezuela, and a statement reproducing the Chinese talk that Hong Kong is “China, like it or not. ” Most Hong Kongers disagree.
No comments: