Lou Taylor insists: I had nothing to do with Britney Spears’ conservatory !!

Last week, Britney Spears called on longtime enemy Lou Taylor and accused her of helping catch her in the conservatory.

Meanwhile, an astonishing documentary presented by the New York Times provided evidence that Britney was being spied on.

The FBI is reportedly investigating the allegation that Britney’s phone was monitored and her home was tapped.

Lou Taylor now insists loudly that she had no part in it anyone of the.

Lou Taylor’s company, Tri Star, filed documents in court, claiming that their involvement in Britney Spears’ life and career is completely overboard.

For 11 years, Lou’s company claims, they provided regular accounting.

The documents even claim that neither Britney nor her former lawyer ever objected.

In particular, the lack of “objection” from Britney or her lawyer is not necessarily that meaningful.

Britney had no real power to control her career or finances or most of the choices in her everyday life.

Meanwhile, her lawyer was not at her choice – only this summer did the court allow her to choose her own legal representation.

Lou’s argument also insists that she and her company were not involved in Britney’s drugs, including alleged medical abuse.

“No one at Tri Star has ever had control over Ms. Spears’ medical treatment,” the lawsuit reads.

From there, the documents dived into the topic of possible illegal surveillance of Britney’s homes and conversations.

“No one at Tri Star has ever suggested monitoring Ms. Spears’ electronic communications,” the documents claim.

“No one at Tri Star has ever had the authority to approve security protocols,” the proposal adds.

“No one at Tri Star is aware of any covert electronic surveillance device located in Ms. Spears’ bedroom,” Lou’s movement reads.

“No one at Tri Star has ever received any compensation related to Ms. Spears or her property,” Tri Star begins.

The document continues: “it is not exactly reflected in the accounts filed or to be filed in this case.”

Of course, very few of the suspicions and accusations surrounding Lou Taylor and Tri Star think otherwise.

See, it’s not like people think Lou and Tri Star made accounting mistakes.

There are real concerns about the amount of money Lou asked to be paid for the role of Tri Star in Britney’s career – and that Jamie agreed to it.

Payments do not have to be criminal for Britney or her followers to feel they were exaggerated.

It is noteworthy that the proposal skips a few charges.

Britney was unable to go on holiday whenever she wanted, and was put on consumption limits – with her own money.

Tri Star’s application does not address these requirements.

Last week, Britney accused Lou Taylor of being one of the architects behind her conservatory.

Specifically, she said that her father, Jamie Spears, was not smart enough to think about it on his own – but that Lynne and Lou suggested it.

Lou’s team argues that they first formally worked with Britney in 2009.

Of course, Lou Taylor had worked with Britney’s sister, Jamie Lynn, back in 2005.

From there, she wormed her way into the Spears family and even served as a family spokeswoman prior to the founding of the conservatory.

It will be interesting to hear how Mathew Rosengart, Britney’s lawyer, reacts to all this, as there are still many strangers.